Vudi Allen jinsiy zo'ravonlik ayblovi - Woody Allen sexual abuse allegation

Vudi Allen Kann 2016.jpg

1992 yil avgustda amerikalik kinorejissyor va aktyor Vudi Allen asrab olgan qizi tomonidan ayblangan Dilan Farrou, keyin etti yoshda, ega bo'lish jinsiy tahqirlash uni asrab olgan onasi, aktrisaning uyida Mia Farrow, yilda Bridgewater, Konnektikut.[1] Allen bu ayblovni bir necha bor rad etgan.[2][3]

Ushbu da'vo ilgari surilganida, Allen va Mia Farrow 12 yillik munosabatda bo'lishgan va uchta farzand ko'rishgan: ikkitasi asrab olingan, Dilan va Muso va bittasi biologik Satchel (hozirgi kunda tanilgan) Ronan Farrow ).[1] The jinsiy zo'ravonlik Farrow Alenning boshqa bir asrab olgan qizi bilan romantik munosabatda bo'lganligini bilganidan sakkiz oy o'tgach sodir bo'lganligi taxmin qilinmoqda. Tez orada-Yi Previn, 1997 yilda Allenga uylangan; Previn birinchi kurs talabasi bo'lgan va 21 yoshda Farrow bu munosabatlar haqida bilib olganida.[4] Allenning ta'kidlashicha, munosabatlar Farrowni qasos uchun ayblovni uyushtirishga undagan.[3] Konnektikut Shtatning advokati da'voni o'rganib chiqdi, ammo ayblovlarni ilgari surmadi.[5] Konnektikut shtati politsiyasi Dilanni Yel-Nyu-Xeyven kasalxonasidagi bolalarga nisbatan jinsiy zo'ravonlik klinikasiga yubordi, u xulosaga ko'ra, Allen Dilanga jinsiy zo'ravonlik qilmagan va bu da'vo Mia Farrow tomonidan murabbiy yoki ta'sir o'tkazgan.[6][7] Nyu-York ijtimoiy xizmatlar departamenti ushbu da'voni tasdiqlovchi "ishonchli dalillar" topmadi.[8]

Ushbu da'voga javoban Allen Farrowni Dilan, Satchel va Musoning yakka qaramog'iga olish uchun sudga berdi.[9] U sudda jinsiy zo'ravonlik ayblovi isbotlanmaganiga rozi bo'lishiga qaramay, u 1993 yil iyun oyida yutqazdi.[10] Dylan bilan uchrashuvlar olti oyga to'xtatib qo'yildi, u dastlabki qamoq ishi paytida azob chekkanidan qutulguncha,[11] Allenga Satchel bilan cheklangan, nazorat ostida tashrif buyurishdi va o'spirin Musoga o'zi qaror qabul qilishga ruxsat berildi.[12][13] Qaror 1994 yilda apellyatsiya tartibida o'z kuchida qoldi[14] va 1995 yil.[15]

Dilan bu da'voni bir necha bor kattalar davrida takrorladi, garchi Mia 1992 yilda yozilgan rivoyatlariga o'zgartirish kiritgan bo'lsa ham.[16][17] Uning birinchi jamoatchilik fikri intervyuda bo'lgan Mureen Orth uchun Vanity Fair 2013 yilda,[18] keyin ochiq xat bilan Nyu-York Tayms 2014 yilda[19] va a Los Anjeles Tayms op-ed 2017 yil dekabrida.[20] Allen, intervyuda, ushbu da'vo haqida jamoatchilik oldida gapirdi Geyl King uchun CBS bu tong, a Nyu-York Tayms op-ed[3] va 2018 yilda uchun bayonotida CBS News, har safar buni rad etish.[21] Mia, uning ikki farzandi Musoning bolalarni zo'rlashida ayblanmoqda[22] va Yaqinda, Yi,[23] uni ham yolg'on da'volarda va Dilanni "miyasini yuvishda" ayblashadi. 2018 yilgi maktubida, Dylanga nisbatan tahqirlangan va o'sha paytda 14 yoshga to'lgan dam olish kunlarini diqqat bilan kuzatishni mas'ul deb bilgan Musa, nima uchun bu da'vo yolg'on ekanligiga batafsil izoh berdi va Miyani majburan qo'llab-quvvatlashini eng katta xato deb ta'rifladi. uning hayoti[24].

Fon

Allen va Farrow

Vudi Allen va Mia Farrow 1980 yilda 12 yillik munosabatlarni boshladilar, bu davrda Farrow o'zining 13 filmida rol o'ynadi.[18] Ular alohida xonadonlarni saqlashdi Manxetten munosabatlar davomida - Farrow davom eting Markaziy Park G'arbiy[25] va Allen Beshinchi avenyu - va turmushga chiqmagan; ikkalasi ham oldin ikki marta turmush qurgan edi.[26]

Mia Farrow, 2012

O'zaro munosabatlar boshlanganda, Farrowning etti farzandi bor edi: bastakor bilan turmush qurganidan uchta biologik o'g'il André Previn; uchta asrab olingan qiz (ikkitasi) Vetnam va bitta Koreys, Tez orada-Yi Previn ); va bitta asrab olingan koreys bolasi Musa.[26][27] 1985 yil iyul oyida u asrab oldi Dilan Farrou dan Texas. Allen farzand asrab olishda ishtirok etmagan, ammo Dilan kelganida u u bilan birga ota-ona rolini o'ynagan va Farrowning uyida ko'proq vaqt o'tkazishni boshlagan. U va Farrou 1987-1989 yillarda Farrow-Previn bolalari bilan bir necha bor Evropaga borgan, ammo sud tergovi "u Farrow xonimning Musodan boshqa bolalaridan yiroq bo'lib qoldi, u o'zi bilan samimiy munosabatda bo'ldi" degan xulosaga keldi.[28] 1987 yil dekabrda Farrow Allenning biologik o'g'li Satchelni (keyinchalik shunday tanilgan) dunyoga keltirdi Ronan Farrow ).[29] Farrow 1991 yilda yana bir farzand asrab olmoqchi edi; Allen, agar u Dilan va Musoni asrab olishiga rozi bo'lsa, u "unga yomon munosabatda bo'lmasligini" aytdi,[28] va o'sha yilning oktyabr oyida u yana bir vetnamlik bolani asrab oldi.[a] Allenning Dilan va Musani asrab olishi 1991 yil 17 dekabrda yakunlandi.[28]

Tashqi tasvirlar
rasm belgisi Bayramda, Leningrad, 1987 yil
Chapdan o'ngga: Ronan, Lark, Vudi Allen, Dilan, Fletcher, Daisy, Tez orada-Yi Previn, Muso va Mia Farrow.
rasm belgisi Allen, Farrow va Tez orada-Yi Previn, v. 1987 yil.

Hibsga olingan sud paytida bergan ko'rsatmalariga ko'ra, Farrow 1987-88 yillarda Allenning Dilanga nisbatan xatti-harakatlaridan xavotirga tushgan. Xabarlarga ko'ra, u Allenga Dilanga juda katta e'tibor berayotgani va unga "nafas olish xonasini" berolmayotganligini aytgan. Aytishlaricha, Allen Dilanga ichki kiyimida o'qigan, unga bosh barmog'ini so'rib olishga ruxsat bergan va ertalab uning uyg'onishini kutib yotgan joyida o'tirgan.[28][30][1] Bir marta, Dylan Allen kelganida o'zini to'rt soat davomida hammomda qamab qo'ygan; u xodimga plyonkali ilmoq bilan qulfni tanlashi kerak edi.[30] Keyinchalik Farrow, Alenning Dilan bilan munosabatlarini "shafqatsiz va g'ayratli", "tortishish sifati" bilan topganiga guvohlik berdi;[31] ammo 1990 yilda u uni o'zgartirdi iroda vafot etgan taqdirda Allen voyaga etmagan bolalarini (Dilan, Satchel va Muso) o'z qaramog'iga olishi kerak edi.[32] Bundan tashqari, 1991 yilda u an tasdiqnoma Allenning Dilan va Musani asrab olishini targ'ib qiluvchi sudyaga, ayniqsa Dylanning otasi sifatidagi Allenning fazilatlarini maqtab: "Janob Allen Dilanga mehribon, g'amxo'r, diqqatli ota-ona va u uni asrab oluvchi ota bo'lishidan faqat foyda ko'rishi mumkin".[33]

Farrow terapevtga Allenni suiiste'mol qilishidan qo'rqishini aytdi Xalta "va u Allenning jinsiy aloqada bo'lishidan xavotirda"boshqa odam bilan ".[31] Oilaviy psixolog, doktor Syuzan Kouts Allenning ba'zi xatti-harakatlariga guvoh bo'lgan va 1993 yilda qamoqqa olingan sud jarayonida guvohlik berganki, u buni jinsiy emas, balki "boshqalarni chetlab o'tganligi sababli noo'rin darajada qizg'in".[4][34] Allen keyinchalik Farrowning yangi tug'ilgan Satchel bilan o'tkazgan vaqtini qoplash uchun Dilanga qo'shimcha e'tibor berganini aytdi.[14] Ga binoan Mureen Orth, Allen 1990 yilda terapiya mashg'ulotlarida ushbu masalani muhokama qilishga kelishib olgan;[1] ammo sud jarayonida Kates, Allen u bilan davolanmaganligini va ikkala ota-ona ham bolalar terapiyasining bir qismi ekanligini aytdi. Allen ota sifatida yaxshilanishni xohlar edi, lekin Dilan bilan noo'rin xatti-harakatlar yoki boshqa muammolar uchun terapiyada bo'lmagan.[35]

Previn bilan munosabatlar

1991 yilda Allen Soon-Yi Previn bilan romantik munosabatlarni boshladi. Allenning so'zlariga ko'ra, bu 1991 yil dekabr oxirida boshlangan.[36] 1992 yil avgust oyida Farrow advokatiga, Alan Dershovits, Yaqinda Yi unga Allen va Yon Yi o'rtasidagi munosabatlar 1991 yil 1 dekabrda boshlanganligini aytdi.[37] Keyinchalik Farrow, bu Previn 1991 yil iyunida tugagan o'rta maktabning so'nggi yilida boshlangan deb da'vo qildi. Shuningdek, Dylan Alen va Previnni 1991 yil yozida yoki kuzida to'shakda birga ko'rgan deb da'vo qildi.[30] Apellyatsiya sudi Allen va Soon-Yi o'rtasidagi jinsiy munosabatlar 1991 yil dekabrda boshlanganligini aniqladi.[38]

Bir munozarali nuqta, o'sha paytda Previnning yoshi qancha bo'lganligi. Farrow va André Previn Yaqinda Yi-ni qabul qilganlarida Seul 1977 yilda Seul oilaviy sudi unga 1970 yil 8 oktyabrda taxmin qilingan tug'ilgan sana bilan qonuniy tug'ilganlik to'g'risidagi hujjatni berdi; u tashlab ketilgan va o'sha shaharning Sent-Poldagi bolalar uyida yashagan.[b] Farrowning so'zlariga ko'ra, oila uning tug'ilgan kunini 1972 yil 8 oktyabrda deb hisoblashgan.[4] 1992 yil may oyida Farrow unga Allenning Soon-Yi bilan aloqasi borligini aytganida, enaga Kristi Grotekening birinchi reaktsiyasi, u 21 yoshda ekanligini eslashi kerak edi.[41] O'zaro munosabatlarning vaqti qisman muammoga aylandi, chunki Farrow Alenni Dylan va Musoni Alenni asrab olish huquqini buzganlik ayblovidan keyin bekor qilishga urinib ko'rdi, chunki uning yaqinda Yi bilan munosabatlari 1991 yil 17-dekabrda farzandlikka olish yakunlanguniga qadar boshlangan edi. .[42]

Tez orada-Yi Previn va Vudi Allen, 2009

O'rta maktabning so'nggi yilida Yon-Yi Allenga model bo'lishni xohlaganligini aytdi; u unga qanday kiyinishni maslahat berdi va professional suratga olishni tashkil qildi.[1] Xabarlarga ko'ra, u basketbol o'yinida unga hamrohlik qila oladimi yoki yo'qmi deb so'radi va bir necha bor birga qatnashgandan keyin ular yanada yaqinlashdilar.[43][28] Ularning munosabatlari 1992 yil 13 yanvarda, Farrow yalang'och holda topilganida paydo bo'ldi Polaroid Yaqinda Yi-ning fotosuratlari mantiya Allenning uyida.[4][44] Yaqinda Yi birinchi kursida edi Drew universiteti yilda Nyu-Jersi.[1] O'sha paytda 56 yoshli Allen Farrowga fotosuratlarni bir kun oldin tushirganini va yaqinda Yi bilan 1991 yil dekabr oyining so'nggi haftasida jinsiy aloqada bo'lganligini aytdi.[36][42] 1993 yilda Alen hibsga olish sudida tasvirlarni shunday deb hisoblashini aytgan erotik, lekin emas pornografik; apellyatsiya sudi fotosuratlarning "janob Allenning xarakteristikasi bilan bo'lishmaganligini" aytdi.[14]

Ushbu kashfiyot oilani hayratda qoldirgan bo'lsa-da, Farrow Allenni uning uyiga tashrif buyurishga to'sqinlik qilmadi,[18] va u o'z ishini yakunladi Er va xotin (1992), u paydo bo'lgan so'nggi filmi.[45][46][47] Farrowning so'zlariga ko'ra, Allen Soon-Yi bilan munosabatlari tugaganligini aytgan;[18] U Allen va All-Soon-Yi o'rtasida hech kim yo'qligini tasdiqlaydigan munosabatlar haqidagi mish-mishlarga javoban qo'shma press-reliz chiqarishni so'ragan deb da'vo qildi, ammo u buni rad etdi.[48] Farrow xafa bo'ldi va g'azablandi,[34] ammo shunga qaramay, o'sha oyda yana ikkita bolani asrab olishdi: ko'r vetnamlik Tam va Isayya Yustus Afroamerikalik o'g'il bola.[1]

Allen va Tez orada-Yi aloqada qolishdi; 1992 yil iyul oyida u yozgi lagerda maslahatchi sifatida ishidan ayrildi Meyn Allen bo'lib chiqqan "janob Simon" bilan telefonda ko'p vaqt o'tkazgandan so'ng.[28] Allenning aytishicha, Dilanning tug'ilgan kunini nishonlash uchun Konnektikutga tashrif buyurganida, Farrou eshikda yozuv qoldirib, uni "bola buzg'unchisi" deb atagan.[49] 1992 yil 1-avgustda, Kotzning ko'rsatmalariga ko'ra, Farrow Koutsga telefon qilib, Yaqin-Yi va Allen hali ham munosabatda bo'lganligini bilib olganligini aytdi; Farrow qiynalib, Kotzga bir hafta oldin, Allen bilan turmush qurish haqida gaplashganini aytdi. "Farrow xonim janob Allenni" shaytoniy va yovuz "deb ta'riflagan", - deydi Kotz va Farrow undan "uni to'xtatish yo'lini toping" deb iltimos qilganini qo'shimcha qildi.[34] Allen Soon-Yi bilan munosabatlarini 1992 yil 17 avgustda ochiq e'lon qildi. U shu oyning oxirida Allen unga hech qachon ota bo'lmagan va Farrow bilan bo'lgan romantikasi tugagandan keyingina ular do'st bo'lishganini aytdi.[50] Allen va Farrow hech qachon turmushga chiqmaganliklari va Allen hech qachon Yon-Yi qabul qilmaganliklari sababli, ularning munosabatlari noqonuniy emas edi.[51] Bu davom etdi va ular 1997 yil 23-dekabrda Venetsiyada turmush qurishdi.[52]

Da'vo

1992 yil 4 avgustda Allen Farrowning Konnektikutdagi uyida Farrowga tashrif buyurdi, Farrow va uning do'sti yaqinda asrab olingan ikkita bola Tam va Ishayo bilan do'konga bordi.[1] Farrow va Allen 6-avgust kuni Allen Dilan, Satchel va Museni qo'llab-quvvatlashi uchun oyiga 6000 dollar to'lashi to'g'risida bitim imzolashi kerak edi;[1] Farrowning advokati Martin Veltzning aytishicha, 4 avgust kuni Farrow uni shartnomani ko'rib chiqishni to'xtatishga chaqirgan.[53]

Farrow ketganidan keyin uyda Dilan bor edi; Sumka; Farrowning enagasi Kristi Groteke; bolalarning frantsuzcha o'qituvchisi Sofi Berge; Farrowning do'stining uch farzandi; va Farrowning do'stining enagasi Elison Striklend. Farrow uydan chiqib ketganda, Muso, uning so'zlariga ko'ra, "o'zi sayr qilgan". Muso Allen kelganida uyda bo'lganini da'vo qilmoqda.[54][55] Tashrifdan bir kun o'tgach, Striklend ish beruvchisiga Dylanning oldida tiz cho'kkan Allenni ko'rganini aytdi, keyin etti yoshga kirgan, yuzi quchog'ida Dylanning jasadiga burilgan; u hibsga olingan sud jarayonida bunga guvohlik berdi.[56] (Sudya Striklendning ko'rsatmalarini eshitib, u har qanday suiiste'mollik yoki noo'rin xatti-harakatlarni tasvirlab berayotganiga ishonmadi).[13] Go'yoki Dilan Farroga nima bo'lganini va unga yoqmaganligini aytdi; Farrou advokatiga rahbarlik qilish uchun telefon qildi va Dylanni mahalliy pediatriga olib borishni maslahat berdi. Farrow Dilanni Farrowning doimiy pediatri Vadakkekara Kavirajanga olib bordi, qiz unga suiiste'mol qilish to'g'risida hech qanday xabar bermadi.

Farro yollagan mutaxassisning so'zlariga ko'ra, Farrow pediatrga ikkinchi bor tashrif buyurishdan oldin Dilanning savollariga javob berayotganini videoga tushirgan va Dylan suiiste'mol qilish ayblovini "yarashgan va boshlagan holda" qilgan va "bolaga ohangni belgilagan" tarzda. qanday javob berish kerak ",[57] va Dilan Farrowga Allen bilan chodirda bo'lganligini aytdi[58] va uning avrat joylariga qo'l tekkizgani haqida.[7][28][1] Ertasi kuni ular Kavirajanni ko'rish uchun qaytib kelishdi va Dilan bu da'voni takrorladi. Keyin Kavirajan rasmiylarga bu haqda xabar berdi, garchi u jinsiy zo'ravonlik haqida hech qanday dalil topmaganligini aytgan bo'lsa ham.[59][60][61] Keyinchalik Kavirajan suhbatdoshiga "shtat qonunchiligi bo'yicha" har qanday ayblovlar to'g'risida xabar berishni talab qilganini aytdi bolalarga nisbatan zo'ravonlik.[61] Kates Allenga da'vo to'g'risida Satchel terapiyasida qatnashgan mashg'ulotlardan birida xabar bergan; u bir necha bor takrorlab, "Men butunlay flabbergasted" deb javob berdi.[34]

Huquqiy harakat

Qamoqqa olish to'g'risidagi ish va bayonotlar

Farrow Dershovitsni Allenga ushbu masalani jamoatchilikka oshkor qilmasdan hal qilishni taklif qilish uchun yolladi.[62] Allen bu taklifni rad etdi.[63]

1992 yil 13 avgustda, da'vo haqida bir hafta o'tgach, Allen sud ishlarini boshladi Nyu-York Oliy sudi faqat Dilan, Muso va Satchelni qo'riqlash uchun.[9] Farrowning onasi, aktyor Morin O'Sallivan, 15-avgust kuni Allenni tanqid qilgan va Farrow Dershovitsni saqlab qolganligini aytgan bayonot chiqardi.[64] Ikki kundan so'ng, Allen Previn bilan bo'lgan munosabatlari to'g'risida birinchi jamoatchilik fikrini e'lon qildi: "Yaqinda Yi-ga bo'lgan muhabbatim haqida: Bu haqiqatan ham baxtli va haqiqatan ham haqiqat. U mening hayotimni o'zgartiradigan va yoqtiradigan yoqimli, aqlli, sezgir ayol. ajoyib ijobiy yo'l. "[65][66]

18 avgust kuni Allen matbuot anjumani o'tkazdi Plaza mehmonxonasi. Qo'rg'oshin ayblovini "gunohsiz bolalarni qasoskor va o'z manfaatini ko'zlagan maqsadlar bilan vijdonsiz va shafqatsiz darajada zararli manipulyatsiya" deb atab, u 13 avgust kuni bo'lib o'tgan uchrashuv paytida Farrow advokatlari 5 milliondan 8 million dollargacha pulni talab qilganini ta'kidladi.[67][68] Dershovitsning so'zlariga ko'ra, advokatlar Allenga pul to'lashni taklif qilishgan bir martalik to'lov Allenning Farrow bilan o'zaro ta'sirini kamaytirish uchun har oy emas, balki bolani qo'llab-quvvatlashda. Har bir bola 21 yoshga to'lgunga qadar oyiga 17000 dollar, kollejda o'qish uchun 900000 dollar va Farrowning o'zi uchun keyingi o'n yil ichida daromad yo'qotishi uchun tovon puli sifatida 2500000 dollar kerak bo'ladi. Allenning advokatlari, Farrowning taklifi, pul evaziga u jinsiy zo'ravonlik ayblovlaridan voz kechishini aytdi. Dershovits buni qat'iyan rad etdi va u bu masalani jamoatchilikka oshkor qilmaslik va Konnektikut politsiyasini ishni eng yaxshi tarzda aralashmaslik va "dekriminallashtirish" emasligiga ishontirishga imkon beradigan va taklif butunlay alohida va iqtisodiy taklifdan mustaqil.[69][70][71] 20 avgustda Allenning publitsisti Allen a o'tganligini e'lon qildi yolg'on detektori testi.[46] Ertasi kuni, bilan suhbatda Uolter Isaakson ning Vaqt jurnal, Allen Previnning yalang'och fotosuratlarini "bir lahzalik larka" deb atadi. O'zaro munosabatlar haqida u shunday dedi: "Men u Miyaning qizi bo'lgani uchun juda katta axloqiy dilemma borligini his qilmadim. Bu haqiqat edi, ammo juda katta importga ega bo'lgan narsa emas."[43][72]

1992 yil kuzida Konnektikut shtati politsiyasi anatomik qo'g'irchoqlar yordamida Dilan bilan suhbatlashdi. So'nggi suhbatlar 1992 yil 30-dekabrda bo'lib o'tdi, unda Dilan erkak qo'g'irchoqning jinsiy olatini ayol qo'g'irchoqning qiniga joylashtirdi. Politsiya undan nega u qo'g'irchoqlar shunday turishini bilishini so'raganda, u ularga yozda Satchel va Allenning jinsiy olatni Soon-Yining qiniga qanday kiritganiga guvoh bo'lganligini aytdi. "Daddies buni qilmaydi", dedi u ularga, "bayonotda aytilishicha" va "dadalar erkak do'sti kabi harakat qilishlari shart emas".[73][74][75] Eleanor Alter protsessni qayta ishlash jarayonida Allenning tashrif huquqlari to'g'risida sud muhokamasi paytida buni oshkor qildi. Da'vo jiddiyligi sababli sessiya to'xtatildi.

1992 yil sentyabr va noyabr oylari orasida Dylan bilan mutaxassislar intervyu oldilar Yel Nyu-Xeyven kasalxonasi.[6] Ushbu mashg'ulotlarda o'rganilgan jihatlardan biri erkak do'stlari va qiz do'stlari o'rtasidagi munosabatlar edi. 1992 yil noyabr oyida bu munosabatlar Dilan uchun "o'pish va quchoqlash" dan iborat edi.[76] Sud tergovi Yon Yi va Allen o'rtasidagi jinsiy munosabatlar 1991 yil dekabrda boshlangan degan xulosaga keldi.[14] Allen Dylanning 1991 yil yozida u va Previn o'rtasidagi jinsiy munosabatlarga guvoh bo'lganligi haqidagi da'volarini rad etdi va ularning munosabatlari dekabrgacha boshlamasligini ta'kidladi. Allen ham Farrowga hujum qilib, "Menimcha, Mia nimadir kerak bo'lganda, u bizning qizimizni olib, uni aytishga majbur qiladi", deb aytdi.[77]

Allen va Farrow kelishuvga erishdilar, unga ko'ra Allen Dylan bilan zudlik bilan tashrif buyurishni boshlamaydi va Farrow unga terapevt beradi.[78]

Yel – Nyu-Xeyven kasalxonasi jamoasi

1992 yil 17 avgustda Konnektikut shtati politsiyasi shafqatsizlik ayblovi bo'yicha tergov olib borayotganligini e'lon qildi.[65][66] Sentyabr oyida politsiya Dylanni Yel Nyu-Xeyven kasalxonasidagi bolalarga jinsiy zo'ravonlik klinikasiga yubordi. Asosiy savollar Dilan haqiqatni aytadimi yoki u jinsiy zo'ravonlikka uchraganmi edi.[6][10] Frank Mako, Shtatning advokati uchun Litchfild 1997 yilda, u Bolani jinsiy zo'ravonlik klinikasidan Dilanning hayotiy guvoh bo'ladimi yoki yo'qligini baholashni so'raganligini e'lon qildi.[79][18] Klinikaning mutaxassislari politsiya va Mako bilan uchrashib, dastlabki ma'lumotni olishdi. 18 sentyabrdan 13 noyabrgacha ular Dilan va uning onasi bilan to'qqizta alohida intervyu o'tkazdilar. 14 oktyabrda ular Groteke bilan suhbatlashdilar va 17 noyabrdan 7 yanvargacha ular Allen bilan uchta intervyu oldilar. Nihoyat, ular Farrow bilan uchrashib, 5 va 6 avgust kunlari Dilan tomonidan yozib olingan yozuvni ko'rib chiqishdi, 4 avgust kuni boshqa enagasi bo'lgan Berge, shuningdek, bolalar bilan muomala qilayotgan ikki psixoterapevt - Kouts va Nensi Shults bilan suhbatlashdilar.[80][81] Bola jinsiy zo'ravonlik klinikasining tibbiy direktori, doktor Jon M. Levental jamoaning hisobotini imzoladi, Dilan esa ijtimoiy ishchilar bilan suhbatlashdi.[81][18] 1993 yil mart oyida yakunlangan hisobot quyidagicha yakunlandi: "Bizning ekspert xulosamizga ko'ra Dylan janob Allen tomonidan jinsiy zo'ravonlikka duch kelmagan".[c]

Jamoa tadqiqotni ushbu asosiy farazlarning bir qismini tasdiqlash yoki rad etishga urinish sifatida taklif qildi:

  1. Dylanning da'volari haqiqatan ham to'g'ri bo'lgan va Allen unga jinsiy zo'ravonlik qilgan.
  2. Dilanning so'zlari haqiqatga to'g'ri kelmasdi va bu stressga javoban, oilaning buzilgan vaziyatiga tushib qolgan, hissiy jihatdan zaif bo'lgan voyaga etmagan tomonidan qilingan.
  3. Dilanga nima deyishga onasi ko'rsatma bergan yoki ta'sir qilgan.

Jamoa Dilanga jinsiy zo'ravonlik ko'rsatilmagan degan xulosaga keldi, ammo qolgan farazlarning qaysi biri to'g'ri ekanligini aytmadi. Bu da'vo uchun eng yaxshi tushuntirish ikkalasining kombinatsiyasi deb hisoblandi.

Jamoa a'zolari Leventhal edi;[82] Doktor Julia Xemilton, shuningdek, ijtimoiy ishchi va Yel tibbiyot markazining bolalarni suiiste'mol qilish dasturining hamraisi bo'lgan;[83] va ijtimoiy ish bo'yicha magistr darajasiga ega bo'lgan va o'n yillik tajribaga ega bo'lgan ijtimoiy ishchi Soyer. Ijtimoiy ishchilar Dilan bilan har juma kuni Yel-Nyu-Xeyvenda bir soat yoki undan ko'proq uchrashishdi. Groteke bilan uch soat suhbatlashildi.[84] Mureen Orth, uning xulosasi, qisman, Dylanning izchil hikoya qilishni qiyinlashtirganligi va "fikrlarning buzilishi" dan aziyat chekkan degan fikrga asoslanganligini ta'kidladi.[60] Xabarda aytilishicha, Dilanning bayonotlaridagi nomuvofiqliklar, o'z-o'zidan paydo bo'lmasligi va o'rganilgan narsalarni takrorlash taassurotlari xulosalar chiqarishga asosiy sabab bo'lgan.[6] Xabarda, shuningdek, Dilan onasining muammolarini hal qilish kerakligini his qilgani,[84] va Farrou, Dilan va Satchel o'rtasidagi munosabatlar juda buzilganligini va zudlik bilan intensiv psixoterapiya zarurligini ko'rsatdi.[76] Hisobotga tarkibni kiritishda jamoa asl eslatmalarni yo'q qildi.[60][80] Hisobot zudlik bilan shtat politsiyasiga yuborildi, ular o'sha kuni va Allenga xabar berishdan ikki kun oldin Farrowga xabar berishdi.[85] Mako 1997 yilda muxbirga Yel "ishni olib, u bilan qochib ketgan" deb aytgan.[79]

Qamoqqa olish bo'yicha sud jarayoni

Guvohlik

Hibsga olish bo'yicha sud majlislari 1993 yil 19 martda Manxetten shtatidagi Oliy sudida boshlangan,[44] va 4 may kuni tugagan.[86] Jurnalistlarning sudga kirishlariga ruxsat berildi, ammo televizor kameralari va mikrofonlariga ruxsat berilmadi.[87] Birinchi kuni pozitsiyani egallab olgan Allen, bu da'vo Farrowning yaqinda Yi bilan "o'zgacha narsadan boshqa narsa" bo'lishni istamagan romantik munosabatlari uchun qasos ekanligini aytdi; u Farrow bu haqda bilmaydi deb umid qilgan edi. U buni qilganda uning g'azabini tasvirlab berdi.[44]

Nyu-York shtati Oliy sud binosi

Groteke,[88] Farrowning enagasi, aprel oyida guvohlik berishicha, taxminan kunning ikkinchi yarmida 15-20 daqiqa davomida u Dilan yoki Allenni uyda topa olmagan; u boshqa bolalar bilan tashqarida ekanliklarini taxmin qildi.[28] Allenning ta'kidlashicha, u munozarali davrda hojatxonaga borgan.[56] Berge guvohlik berishicha, o'sha kuni Dilan ko'ylak ostida ichki kiyim kiymagan.[28][81][4] O'sha kuni uyda bo'lmagan Farrowning boshqa enagasi Monika Tompson 1993 yil fevral oyida Allenning advokatlariga Farrow tomonidan ushbu ayblovni qo'llab-quvvatlash uchun bosim o'tkazganini aytdi.[89][90] Tompsonning ta'kidlashicha, Grotekening rezervasyonlari ham bo'lgan; Tompsonning so'zlariga ko'ra, Groteke unga da'vo qilinganidan bir necha kun o'tgach, "Dilanni besh daqiqadan ko'proq vaqt davomida uning ko'z o'ngida ko'rmaganligini aytdi. U Dilanning ichki kiyimsiz qolganini eslamadi".[89][4] Groteke u bilan suhbatlashganini tan oldi, lekin faqat Tompsonga Dilanni ko'rmayotganini eslolmasligini aytganini tan oldi.[91] Qiz ikki oyligidan beri Dilanning enasi bo'lgan Tompson ham Farrowning Allenga qo'ygan ayblovlari "haqiqatga to'g'ri kelmasligini" aytdi.[92] Farrowning 13 yillik uy bekasi Mavis Smit Allenni yaxshi ota deb o'ylaganini va Allenni Dilan yoki Satchel bilan jinsiy aloqada bo'lganligini ko'rmaganligini aytdi.[93]

Koutsning aytishicha, Farvin Previn bilan munosabatlarini aniqlaganda Allenga shunchalik g'azablanganki, Kouts Allenning xavfsizligi uchun qo'rqqan.[34] Farrowning advokati Katesni voqealarning Alen versiyasini qabul qilganlikda aybdorlikda aybladi.[94] Farrow va Allen 1991 yil aprel oyida Shultsni yollashdi, chunki bola "o'z xayolot dunyosida yashagan".[95] Shultzning ta'kidlashicha, Dilan "xayol nimaga berilib ketgan va u haqiqatga aylangan".[96] Kates ham, Shults ham jinsiy zo'ravonlik sodir bo'lganiga ishonishmadi.[10] Allenning advokatlaridan biri Farrowning advokatlari, agar Allen taxminan 7 million dollar to'lashga rozi bo'lsa, "ayblovlar bekor qilinishi mumkin" degan fikrni ilgari surdi. Farrow vakili Dershovitsning aytishicha, urinish uchun "kashfiyot" sessiyasi bo'lib o'tgan vositachilik. "Buni tovlamachilik uchrashuvi deb ta'riflash bema'ni", dedi u. Uning so'zlariga ko'ra, Allenning advokatlari "tuzoq tashlamoqchi edilar, tuzoq muvaffaqiyatsizlikka uchradi va endi ular tuzoq muvaffaqiyatga erishgandek guvohlik berishmoqda". Allenning advokatlaridan biri qachon bo'lganini tan oldi so'roq qilingan asosan bolalarning ta'limi va tibbiy yordami bilan bog'liq bo'lgan pul, shuningdek Farrowning Allen uchun film ishi uchun qarzdorlik haqida.[56] Farrowning advokati Levett "bolalarni qo'llab-quvvatlash, shu jumladan uy yordami uchun kelishuvga erishish uchun turli xil miqdorlarni taklif qilganini tan oldi: bolalarning eng kichigi 21 yoshga to'lgunga qadar oyiga 17000 dollar, inflyatsiya va foizlarni hisobga olgan holda taxminan 2,5 million dollar. O'qish uchun Uchtasi kollejga o'qishga kirdi: 800000 dan 900000 dollargacha, shuningdek, tibbiy va ha, psixiatriya bo'yicha aniqlanmagan xarajatlar. zararni qoplash to'g'risidagi da'vo chunki otasini uni haqorat qilganlikda ayblagan Dilan uchun. Allenning yillik filmlaridagi rollari uchun yiliga 300 ming dollar ishlab topgan va shu ishdan bo'shatilganligi sababli besh-o'n yil davomida ushbu summani olish huquqiga ega bo'lgan Mia Farrou uchun tovon puli. "[97] Dershovits Levettning ko'rsatmalarini qo'llab-quvvatladi, ammo bolalarni suiiste'mol qilish bo'yicha tergovda xususiy shaxs foydasiga shafoat qilish to'g'risida taklif qilinganligini aytdi. turar-joy. Uning so'zlariga ko'ra, ushbu taklif "har qanday to'lov uchun shart emas edi".[72] 1992 yil 14 oktyabrda Dershovits intervyu beruvchiga aytdi Charli Rose: "Menimcha, bu hech qachon chiqmasligi kerak edi. Agar u [Vudi Allen] bu da'voni bermagan bo'lsa, men bugun bu voqeani hech kim bilmaydi deb o'ylayman va bu voqea jimgina parda ortida hal bo'lardi."[98]

Leventhal tomonidan tasdiqlangan yotqizish 20 aprelda. Dylanning hisobotidagi nomuvofiqliklarni keltirib, uning so'zlariga ko'ra, Dylanning hikoyasi aslida sodir bo'lgan voqealarga mos kelishi haqidagi gipoteza bekor qilingandan so'ng, Yel Nyu-Xeyven jamoasi "ikkita farazga ega edi: bittasi, bu hissiyotlari buzilgan bola tomonidan qilingan bayonotlar va keyin uning fikriga o'rnashib qoldi va boshqa faraz uning murabbiyi yoki onasi ta'sirida bo'lganligi haqida edi. Biz qat'iy xulosaga kelmadik, biz bu kombinatsiya deb o'ylaymiz. "[99] Farrou va Allen ikkalasi ham yollashdi ekspert guvohlari hisobotni muhokama qilish.[80] Sud psixologi Anne Meltzer Allenga guvohlik berib, hisobot "ular to'plagan ma'lumotlar bilan yaxshi tasdiqlangan xulosalarga kelgan". Uning so'zlariga ko'ra, Dilanning da'vo qilgan lentasi "nuqsonli", chunki uni professional emas, balki bir tomon suratga olgan.[80][100][101] Bolalar psixiatrlari Stiven Xerman Farrowga ko'rsatma berib, hisobot "jiddiy nuqsonli" ekanligini va u Dilanning bayonotlarida fikrlash buzilishining dalillarini topa olmaganligini,[80][100] ammo hisobot bir tomonlama emas edi[102][103] va dalillarni hisobga olgan holda, u suiiste'mol qilish ayblovi to'g'risida biron bir xulosaga kela olmadi.[104] Kimga Charlz Patrik Eving va Jozef Makken, hisobotning eng zararli tanqidlari, jamoa o'z suhbatlaridan o'z yozuvlarini yo'q qilgani, ya'ni sud hisobot xulosalarining to'g'riligini tekshira olmasligini anglatadi; ular sud ekspertlari o'z yozuvlarini ko'rib chiqish uchun saqlab qolish majburiyatini olganligini yozadilar. Yana bir tanqid shuki, jamoa Leventhalni depozit qilishdan tashqari sudda guvohlik berishni xohlamagan.[105] Xerman, shuningdek, Dilanning da'vo qilayotgan lentasi nuqsonli bo'lganini tan oldi, chunki u "bolaga qanday javob berish to'g'risida ohangni belgilaydigan" tarzda yaratilgan.[106] Shuningdek, u Dylanni ayblov bo'yicha yana bir bor baholash uchun hech qanday ma'no yo'q degan xulosaga keldi.[13]

Sud jarayonida guvohlik bergan barcha psixiatriya mutaxassislari, Allen Dylan terapiyasida foydali rol o'ynashi mumkin degan fikrga kelishdi.[14][13]

Qaror

1993 yil iyun oyida 33 betlik qarorida,[13] Adliya Elliott Uilk Allenning uchta bolani qamoqqa olish to'g'risidagi arizasini rad etdi va jinsiy zo'ravonlik haqidagi da'voni rad etdi, Allenning Dylanga zudlik bilan tashrif buyurish huquqini rad etdi va Allenning Dylanga nisbatan xatti-harakatlari "bu juda noo'rin va uni himoya qilish uchun choralar ko'rish kerak" deb aytdi. Allenning noo'rin xatti-harakatlari jinsiy xarakterga ega emasligini ta'kidlar ekan.[13][12][107] Allenning ota-onasi bo'lgan Uilkning tanqidlari qattiq edi.[108][28] Allenning Farrowni "jirkanch ayol" sifatida ko'rsatishini rad etib, Uilk Dilanga murabbiylik qilgani haqida ishonchli dalillar yo'qligini aytdi, garchi u Dilan tomonidan tayyorlangan videokamera jinsiy zo'ravonlik tergoviga putur etkazgan bo'lsa va Allenni "burilish" sinov strategiyasi "uchun tanqid qildi. oila a'zolari va xodimlar bir-biriga qarshi. Yel New Haven jamoasining sudda guvohlik berishni istamasligi, faqat Leventhalning depozitidan tashqari, uning yozuvlarini yo'q qilish bilan birga, o'z hisobotini taqdim etgan, "u sanitarizatsiya qilingan va shuning uchun unchalik ishonchli emas".[105][28][13][12] Uilk bu ishni "beparvo" deb atadi va Allenga Farrowning xarajatlarini to'lashni buyurdi.[12][107] Suiiste'mol qilish to'g'risidagi da'voga kelsak, Uilk dalillar uning sodir bo'lganligini tasdiqlamaydi, garchi u dalillarning bunday bo'lmaganligini aniq ko'rsatganiga amin emas edi. Uilk Dylan bilan sud-tibbiy ekspertizasining yangi batareyasini buyurtma qilmadi, chunki barcha ekspertlar hisobot xulosalari bilan rozi bo'lishdi va bu foydali yoki foydali ma'lumot bermaydi.[10]

Jinoiy surishtiruv, ijtimoiy xizmatlar

Konnektikut shtati politsiyasi 1993 yil yanvar oyida Litchfildda Allen bilan uch soatdan ko'proq suhbatlashdi. Uning so'zlariga ko'ra, u hech qachon uyingizda bo'lmagan bo'shliqni sudralib chiqish; politsiya u erda barmoq izlarini olganini aytganida, uning izlari u erda bo'lishi mumkinligini aytgan. Konnektikut shtatidagi jinoyatchilik laboratoriyasining sud mutaxassisi, doktor Genri Lining aytishicha, politsiya sudralib yurgan joydan topgan narsa soch tolasi va dalillar Allenni chodirga joylashtirolmaydi. O'sha yilning 20 sentyabrida Frank Mako politsiya ayol detektivi hamrohligida Dilan bilan suhbatlashdi; Mako 1997 yilda muxbirga «Men to'liq ko'rdim chekinish har doim men voqeani muhokama qilishga urindim. "[79][18]

1993 yil 24 sentyabrda Mako matbuot konferentsiyasini o'tkazdi, ammo u shafqatsiz ayblovni ta'qib qilmasligiga qaramay mumkin bo'lgan sabab, Dylanni shikastlamaslik istagini aytib.[79][5][109] Qarorning rasmiy bayonotida prokuratura, Mako hibsga olingan taqdirda ham, ayblov uchun "o'rtacha shubhadan" ko'ra ko'proq qulay dalil standarti bo'lgan taqdirda ham, suiiste'mol qilingan degan xulosaga kelish imkonsiz bo'lganligini tan oldi. Shuningdek, u dalillarning mohiyati mudofaa uchun qulay zamin ekanligini va "Nyu-York Oliy sudining hibsga olish ishidagi kabi proektivlikka ega bo'lmasligini" va "o'z vazifasini" fosh etishning asossiz xavfidan qochish deb bilishini aytdi. shubhali ta'qib qilishning qat'iy va noaniqligiga bolani ".[110]

Nyu-York ijtimoiy xizmatlar departamentiga yozgan xatida Allenning psixoterapevti Ketrin Preskott uning psixologik profilining "albatta jinsiy huquqbuzar "va shuningdek," janob Allen jinsiy buzuqlik / deviant jinsiy xulq-atvori bilan og'riganligi to'g'risida hech qachon hech qanday taklif bo'lmagan "dedi.[111] Nyu-York ijtimoiy xizmatlar bo'limi 1993 yil oktyabr oyida o'zining 14 oylik tergovini yopdi; Allenga yozgan maktubida: "Ushbu hisobotda ko'rsatilgan bolaga nisbatan zo'ravonlik yoki yomon munosabatda bo'lganligi to'g'risida ishonchli dalillar topilmadi. Shuning uchun bu xabar asossiz deb topildi."[8]

Allen Konnektikut shtatidagi Jinoyat ishlari bo'yicha sud komissiyasiga va shtatning advokatlik kengashiga Makoning ehtimoliy sabablar haqidagi bayonoti yuzasidan shikoyat qildi.[112] Birinchisi shikoyatni 1993 yil noyabr oyida rad etdi.[113] 1994 yil fevral oyida shtat bo'ylab shikoyatlarni ko'rib chiqish bo'yicha qo'mita, Mako shtatning yuristlarning odob-axloq qoidalarini buzmagan bo'lsa-da, uning bayonoti "jiddiy tashvish" uchun sabab bo'lgan. Bundan tashqari, Mako o'z bayonotining nusxasini Allenning Dilan va Musoni asrab olishini bekor qilish to'g'risida qaror chiqargan sudyaga yuborgan. Ushbu harakat "noo'rin, talab qilinmagan va potentsial jihatdan zararli" edi, deyiladi sud majlisida.[114]

Allenning murojaatlari, boshqa qonuniy choralar

1992 yil dekabr oyida Farrow Dylan va Museni Allen tomonidan qabul qilinishini bekor qilish uchun muvaffaqiyatsiz sud ishlarini boshladi. Uning pozitsiyasi qisman Allenning Previn bilan romantik munosabatlari 1991 yil 17-dekabrda farzandlikka olish yakunlanguniga qadar boshlangan degan fikrga asoslangan edi.[42][28] Allenning ta'kidlashicha, jinsiy munosabatlar 1991 yilning so'nggi haftasida boshlangan.[42] U Farrow Dylan va Musani asrab olish to'g'risidagi urinishlarini bekor qilsa, u qamoqqa olish to'g'risidagi qaror ustidan shikoyat qilmaslikni taklif qildi, ammo u rad etdi.[42]

1994 yil yanvar oyida Allen murojaat qildi Uilkning qarori.[115] Apellyatsiya sudi tahqirga oid da'voga binoan, "ayblovlarni tasdiqlovchi dalillar natijasiz qolmoqda", "Farrow xonim ayblovlarni hech qanday asoslarsiz to'qib chiqqani haqidagi xulosaga qarshi yozuvlar militsiyasini ko'rib chiqish" va Uilk tomonidan aniq tuzatilganligini aytdi. Yel-Nyu-Xeyven jamoasining Dylanning "xayolga berilib ketish" istagi borligi va u bir-biriga mos kelmaydigan hisob-kitoblarni bergani haqidagi fikri hisobga olinishi kerakligini aytdi. As elements suggesting that the abuse could have occurred but insufficient for this conclusion to be more likely than the contrary the court listed "the testimony given at trial by the individuals caring for the children that day, the videotape of Dylan made by Ms. Farrow the following day and the accounts of Dylan's behavior toward Mr. Allen both before and after the alleged instance of abuse." The court was critical of Allen's parenting skills and relationship with Previn. The appeal failed, although two of the five judges said the visitation rights regarding Satchel were too restrictive.[14] Allen appealed again, and in July 1995 the Nyu-York apellyatsiya sudi upheld the original decision.[15]

History of statements by the protagonists

1992: Soon-Yi mentioning Mia's violence

Soon-Yi wrote in 1992 that Allen was never a father figure to her, but just "man who happens to be the ex-boyfriend of Mia ... Mia was always very hot-tempered and given to rages which terrified all the kids. They can't speak freely because they're still dependent on her. But they could really tell stories and I'm sure one day will. It's true Mia was violent with me and I have conclusive proof, but I hope she and Woody can somehow head off a custody trial."[116]

1997: What Falls Away

In Mia Farrow's 1997 memoir, What Falls Away, Farrow repeated the accusation that Allen had sexually abused Dylan.[117] The allegation was mentioned in several of the book's reviews.[118][119]

2014: Ronan's tweets and Dylan's open letter

Ronan Farrow, 2012

When Allen won the Oltin globus Sesil B. DeMil mukofoti in January 2014, Farrow and Satchel (now going by the name Ronan Farrow and working as a journalist) tweeted objections.[120] Dylan, then 28, repeated the molestation allegation the next month in an ochiq xat ustida Nyu-York Tayms blog Nikolas Kristof, oilaviy do'stim. Writing that Allen had made her feel uncomfortable "for as long as [she] could remember", she alleged, for example, that he would get into bed with her in his underwear and that she would hide to avoid him.[19] Allen called the allegations "untrue and disgraceful"[121] and responded with an op-ed in the Times.[3][122] Ronan noted that the Times allowed Dylan's open letter 936 words on Kristof's blog while Allen's op-ed was twice as long and published in the print edition.[123]

Ronan, aged four in 1992, has been critical of Allen for several years; in 2011 he tweeted, "He's my father married to my sister. That makes me his son and his brother-in-law. That is such a moral transgression."[124] Yilda Hollywood Reporter in May 2016, he wrote that, after Dylan's open letter was published, his colleagues had forwarded him the daily emails "blasted out by Allen's powerful publicist", with an open cc list, taklif talking points for reporters and the names of friends, therapists and lawyers willing to be interviewed. He wrote: "Reporters on the receiving end of this kind of PR blitz have to wonder if deviating from the talking points might jeopardize their access to all the other A-list clients."[123]

Moses Farrow's response to Dylan and accusations against Mia

Dylan's brother Moses, who was 14 in 1992, has reconciled with Allen and is estranged from the Farrow family. When Dylan published her open letter, he said in an interview that several people had been in the house on the disputed day and that "no one, not my father or sister, was off in any private spaces". He asserted that Farrow had cultivated a climate in which he and his siblings had felt compelled to support her views, and that she had abused him jismonan va hissiy jihatdan.[125] Moses repeated the allegations in 2017 to Erik Laks, one of Allen's biographers.[126]

2017/2018: Dylan's op-ed and interview

Shuningdek qarang: Vaynshteyn ta'siri, Men ham (hashtag) va Vaqt tugadi (harakat)
Tashqi rasm
rasm belgisi Dilan Farrou (chapda) speaks to Geyl King, CBS bu tong, January 18, 2018.

In December 2017, following the Xarvi Vaynshteyn janjali, Dylan wrote an op-ed in the Los Anjeles Tayms asking, "Why has the #MeToo revolution spared Woody Allen?"[20] She repeated the molestation allegation in January 2018 in a television interview with Geyl King uchun CBS bu tong.[127]

Allen response to Dylan's interview

Allen issued a statement in response:

[E]ven though the Farrow family is cynically using the opportunity afforded by the Time's Up movement to repeat this discredited allegation, that doesn't make it any more true today than it was in the past. I never molested my daughter – as all investigations concluded a quarter of a century ago.[128]

May 2018: Moses's letter defending Allen and accusing Farrow of child abuse

On May 23, 2018, Moses posted online a long open letter[129][130] with new elements, in which he alleged in detail that Farrow physically and emotionally abused him and Soon-Yi: "She hit me uncontrollably all over my body. She slapped me, pushed me backwards and hit me on my chest, shouting, 'How dare you say I’m a liar in front of my friend? You’re the pathological liar.' I was defeated, deflated, beaten and beaten down. ... When Soon-Yi was young, Mia once threw a large porcelain centerpiece at her head. Luckily it missed, but the shattered pieces hit her legs. Years later, Mia beat her with a telephone receiver."[131][55] Moses also says Farrow treated her biological children better than her adopted ones, and that Mia "brainwashed" her kids to accept her own version of insignificant things.

Moses claims that on the afternoon of the alleged abuse, he was at home: "As the 'man of the house' that day, I had promised to keep an eye out for any trouble, and I was doing just that. I remember where Woody sat in the TV room, and I can picture where Dylan and Satchel were. Not that everybody stayed glued to the same spot, but I deliberately made sure to note everyone's coming and going. I do remember that Woody would leave the room on occasion, but never with Dylan. He would wander into another room to make a phone call, read the paper, use the bathroom, or step outside to get some air and walk around the large pond on the property."[55] Moses also claimed that the memory his sister has of having been abused while focusing her attention on an electric train set is not possible: "It’s a precise and compelling narrative, but there’s a major problem: there edi no electric train set in that attic. There was, in fact, no way for kids to play up there, even if we had wanted to. It was an unfinished crawl space, under a steeply-angled gabled roof, with exposed nails and floorboards, billows of fiberglass insulation, filled with mousetraps and droppings and stinking of mothballs, and crammed with trunks full of hand-me-down clothes and my mother’s old wardrobes. The idea that the space could possibly have accommodated a functioning electric train set, circling around the attic, is ridiculous."[55]

Moses wrote that Thompson saw Farrow filming Dylan in what looked like an effort to coach her. He further alleged that Farrow drove some of her children to o'z joniga qasd qilish: "Most media sources claim my sister Tam died of 'heart failure' at the age of 21. In fact, Tam struggled with depressiya for much of her life, a situation exacerbated by my mother refusing to get her help, insisting that Tam was just 'moody'. One afternoon in 2000, after one final fight with Mia, which ended with my mother leaving the house, Tam committed suicide by overdosing on pills."

Of the shy support he had given to Mia when he was a teenager, Moses stated: "During the custody hearing, my mother kept stressing how we needed to stick together as a family. Frightened and beaten down, I, too, played my part. I even wrote a letter condemning Woody, saying that he had done something horrible and unforgivable, and had broken my dreams. I even read the letter for the news media that were now regularly gathered at the end of our driveway, knowing that doing so would earn my mother’s approval. That public denouncement of my father remains the biggest regret of my life."

2018: Soon-Yi defends Allen and accuses Farrow of abuse

Maqolasida Vulture, [132][133], Previn alleged that Farrow invented stories about her origins: "When Soon-Yi was a girl, she says, Farrow asked her to make a tape about her origins, detailing how she’d been the daughter of a prostitute who beat her. The request puzzled her, Soon-Yi says, since she had no memory of anything like that, so she refused...'Mia used to write words on my arm, which was humiliating, so I’d always wear long-sleeved shirts. She would also tip me upside down, holding me by my feet, to get the blood to drain to my head. Because she thought—or she read it, God knows where she came up with the notion—that blood going to my head would make me smarter or something'.” According to Previn, Farrow also resorted to “arbitrarily showing her power” by slapping her across the face and spanking her with a hairbrush or calling her “stupid” and “moronic.” Previn also claimed she and her adopted sisters were used as “domestics ”.

Responses from venues

Haykal Oviedo, Ispaniya

2018 yil yanvar oyida Goodspeed Opera teatri in Connecticut canceled its adaptation of Allen's film Broadway ustidagi o'qlar (1994).[134] The following month, Circle Theater in Grand Rapids, Michigan, also canceled their adaptation of Broadway ustidagi o'qlar.[135]

In February 2018, Savanah Lyon, a theater major at the Kaliforniya universiteti, San-Diego (UCSD), began organizing an online petition to have a course teaching Allen's films removed from the UCSD reja, saying that because of the abuse allegations against him, the university should not have a class devoted to his work. On February 16, the UCSD Academic Senate announced that it would retain the course, stating that the removal of courses featuring "controversial material, or even material widely regarded as morally problematic" would undermine the values of free inquiry and akademik erkinlik.[136]

Divided celebrity reactions

After Dylan's 2014 open letter, several actors issued statements critical of Allen, including Rozi O'Donnel,[137] Lena Dunham,[138] Sara Silverman,[139] va Syuzan Sarandon.[140]

The mood changed further as a result of the #MeToo and Time's Up movements and Dylan's op-ed. During a November 2017 women's rally, a banner referring to the allegation was hung around the neck of Allen's statue in Oviedo, Ispaniya. A women's group later asked that the statue be removed.[141] From October 2017 statements supportive of Dylan, or expressing regret at having worked with Allen, were issued by Griffin Nyuman,[142] Ellen Peyj,[143][144] Evan Reychel Vud,[145][146] Devid Krumxolts,[147] Mira Sorvino,[148] Rebekka zali,[149] Timotey Chalamet,[150] Reychel Brosnaxon,[151] Natali Portman,[152] Kolin Fert,[153] Xeyli Atuell,[154] va Freida Pinto.[155] Newman, Hall, Chalamet and Elle Fanning said they would donate their earnings from Allen's film Nyu-Yorkda yomg'irli kun (2018) to charities.[150]

Others expressed mixed feelings. Jon Turturro, who cast Allen in his romantic comedy Yo'qolib borayotgan Gigolo, said, "He was a respectful person to me professionally. Now is a different time. I wouldn't cast him now. ... I don’t regret having worked with him".[156] Greta Gervig initially declined to answer questions about around her work with Allen in Sevgi bilan Rimga (2012). In 2018, while promoting Ledi qush, Gerwig came under scrutiny for her work with Allen. Yoqilgan Milliy radio "s Toza havo, when she was asked about working with Allen, Gerwig said, "I think I'm living in that space of fear of being worried about how I talk about it and what I say."[157] She responded to a similar question after Ledi qush g'olib bo'ldi "Oltin globus" mukofoti eng yaxshi kinofilm uchun - Musiqali yoki komediya by saying, "[my] job right now I think is to occupy the position of writer and director."[158] After being publicly criticized by Dylan Farrow for ignoring her allegations, Gerwig apologized for working with Allen.[157] She elaborated in an interview with The New York Times: "Dylan Farrow's two different pieces made me realize that I increased another woman's pain, and I was heartbroken by that realization. I grew up on his movies, and they have informed me as an artist, and I cannot change that fact now, but I can make different decisions moving forward."[159] Fanning said that she regretted her decision "if it hurt anyone" but did not apologize for working with Allen.[160] Xoakin Feniks said, "When I worked with Woody, I knew about the stuff that had come up years ago. I know his daughter ended up writing an open letter. I was not aware of that when we worked together."[161] Intervyusida NBC "s Matbuot bilan tanishing, Jeff Deniels said, "Would I do another one with Woody? The difficult decision would be to turn him down, because of Qohiraning binafsha atirguli."[162][163] Piter Sarsgaard, when asked whether he would work with Allen, said, "It's such a complicated question. I've already done a Woody Allen movie".[164] Xloe Sevigny said, “I have my own turmoil that I’m grappling with over that decision. Would I work with him again? Probably not.”[165] Marion Kotillard said, "I have to say today, yeah, if he were to ask me again ... I don’t think it would ever happen because the experience we had together was very odd. I admire some of his work but we had no connection on set.”[166]

Those expressing support for Allen included Barbara Uolters va Dayan Kiton,[167] shu qatorda; shu bilan birga Xaver Bardem, Yahudo qonuni, Alek Bolduin va Bill Maher.[168][169][170][171] Robert B. Vayd, who made a documentary film on Allen,[172] published his rebuttals to the Farrows' allegations in a Kundalik hayvon article titled "The Woody Allen Allegations: Not So Fast"[173] and dealt with the subject again in 2019 in two articles, "The Truth About Woody Allen I and II".[174][175] Cherry Jones said, "There are those who are comfortable in their certainty. I am not. I don't know the truth ... When we condemn by instinct our democracy is on a slippery slope."[176] Skarlett Yoxansson said, "I love Woody, I believe him, and I would work with him anytime." She added, "I see Woody whenever I can, and I have had a lot of conversations with him about it. I have been very direct with him, and he's very direct with me. He maintains his innocence, and I believe him."[177] Emili Mortimer said, "I believe in tegishli jarayon...I think these things really need to go through all the legal processes before anyone can judge. I don’t really have an answer to those questions."[178] Qachon Christiane Amanpour deb so'radi Keyt Blanshett about the allegations against Allen, she replied, "At the time, I said it’s a very painful and complicated situation for the family, which I hope they have the ability to resolve", and added, "If these allegations need to be reexamined, which, in my understanding, they’ve been through court, then I'm a big believer in the justice system and setting legal precedents...If the case needs to be reopened, I am absolutely, wholeheartedly in support of that."[179] Keyt Uinslet declined to comment on the matter, saying, "As the actor in the film, you just have to step away and say, I don't know anything, really, and whether any of it is true or false. Having thought it all through, you put it to one side and just work with the person." She did however describe the experience of working with Allen as "extraordinary."[180] Xaver Bardem said, "I am very shocked by this sudden treatment. Judgments in the states of New York and Connecticut found him innocent...I don’t agree with the public lynching that he’s been receiving, and if Woody Allen called me to work with him again, I'd be there tomorrow morning. He's a genius.”[181][182] Alan Alda said, "I'd work with him again if he wanted me. I'm not qualified to judge him. I don't know all the facts. I don't know if he's guilty or innocent. But you can be uncertain—that's what I go on. I just don't have enough information to convince me I shouldn't work with him. And he's an enormously talented guy."[183] Maykl Keyn, who initially expressed regret about working with Allen and said he would never work with him again, later said, "If he had a trial and someone proved he had done something, I wouldn't do it, no. But I didn't read of him being on trial and being found guilty or fined or sent to prison or anything. This is all things that people say. You can’t go on hearsay the whole time."[184][185] Jeff Goldblum said, "I think there is a presumption of innocence until proven guilty. I also admire his body of work. So I would consider working with him again until I learned something more.”[186] Larri Devid, who read Allen's autobiography, Hech narsaning aproposlari, called it "a fantastic book, so funny. You feel like you're in the room with him... it's just a great book and it's hard to walk away after reading that book thinking that this guy did anything wrong."[187] When asked about Allen while promoting Da 5 qon, Spike Li said, "I'd just like to say Woody Allen's a great, great filmmaker, and this cancel thing is not just Woody. And I think that when we look back on it, [we're] gonna see that, short of killing somebody, I don't know if you can just erase somebody like they never existed. Woody's a friend of mine ... I know he's going through it right now."[188][189]

Woody Allen memoir Hech narsaning aproposlari

Asosiy maqola: Hech narsaning aproposlari

In his memoir, Allen addresses Dylan's allegation, writing that, unlike other cases of sexual abuse that could have been ignored without being taken seriously or adequately investigated, the accusation against him was immediately and thoroughly investigated by two groups of experts which concluded that the evidence proved that there was no sexual abuse, that Dylan's statements had "a rehearsed quality" and she was likely "coached or influenced by her mother". Regarding the criticism against Yale New Haven for having destroyed the original case notes, Allen maintains that that was Yale New Haven's and the Federal qidiruv byurosi 's usual procedure to preserve privacy. Moreover, the New York State Child Welfare scrupulously investigated the case for 14 months and concluded that there was no credible evidence of abuse and that the allegation was unfounded.

Allen recounts a Yale New Haven interview session in which Farrow explained to experts how Dylan was so disturbed by the sexual abuse that she turned to her sister Lark for physical comfort. Allen noted that Lark was in New York on the day of the alleged abuse and couldn't have physically interacted with Dylan, following which Farrow changed her account and said that, "Dylan hugged [Lark] spiritually." Allen also contends that Maco's investigation should have been closed the moment his experts ruled out the possibility of abuse, and states Maco's statement that there was "probable cause" was unfounded. Allen also writes that a nanny and a housekeeper who worked at Farrow's house said that on multiple occasions the prosecutor came to the residence and he and Farrow went out to lunch. Allen regrets that this does not seem the most impartial way to conduct an investigation.

Allen also claims that during the custody trial, a court clerk habitually drove Farrow home from the courthouse and that that was an “unfair conduit to the judge”; referred to Moses's testimony that he witnessed how Farrow coaching Dylan; and reported the testimony of a babysitter to whom Dylan said, "Mummy wants me to lie." Allen alleges that long before the allegation of abuse emerged, Farrow took Dylan to a child therapist because the girl had trouble distinguishing between reality and fantasy and that, in the midst of family turmoil, Farrow suggested to the child that she had been abused which resulted in Dylan sincerely believing it.[190]

Izohlar

  1. ^ Farrow found that the child was too disabled and needed more care than she could provide; she helped to find him another family.[25]
  2. ^ "Information concerning this case was obtained from Mr. and Mrs. André G. Previn ... The beneficiary, Soon Hee Oh, aka Soon Yi Oh, is a native and citizen of Korea with a presumptive birth date of October 8, 1970."[39] "Memorandum of information concerning H.R. 1352 for the relief of Oh Soon Hee submitted by the American Embassy at Seoul, Korea. The beneficiary is an abandoned child, who was found in Seoul, Korea on February 12, 1976. She was placed temporarily in the care of Maria's House, a local institution for abandoned children while an effort was made to identify and locate her parents and relatives. When this search failed, the beneficiary was transferred to the care of St. Paul's Orphanage ... in Seoul, where she currently lives. The Seoul Family Court established a Family Census Register (legal birth document) in her behalf on December 28, 1976, with a presumptive birth date of October 8, 1970. The beneficiary attends kindergarten classes held in the orphanage. Through the auspices of the Social Welfare Society, Inc., ... and the Friends of Children adoption agency in the United States, the child has been selected for adoption by Mr. and Mrs. André George Previn, of Martha's Vineyard, Mass. ...[40]
  3. ^ Yel-Nyu-Xeyven kasalxonasi Child Sexual Abuse Clinic (1993): "It is our expert opinion that Dylan was not sexually abused by Mr. Allen. Further, we believe that Dylan’s statements on videotape and her statements to us during our evaluation do not refer to actual events that occurred to her on August 4th, 1992 ... In developing our opinion we considered three hypotheses to explain Dylan's statements. First, that Dylan’s statements were true and that Mr. Allen had sexually abused her; second, that Dylan's statements were not true but were made up by an emotionally vulnerable child who was caught up in a disturbed family and who was responding to the stresses in the family; and third, that Dylan was coached or influenced by her mother, Ms. Farrow. While we can conclude that Dylan was not sexually abused, we can not be definite about whether the second formulation by itself or the third formulation by itself is true. We believe that it is more likely that a combination of these two formulations best explains Dylan's allegations of sexual abuse."[3][80][81]

Adabiyotlar

  1. ^ a b v d e f g h men j Ort, Mureen (August 5, 2008). "Mia's Story". Vanity Fair. Arxivlandi from the original on November 1992.
  2. ^ "Woody Allen defends himself on '60 Minutes' in '92". CBS News. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2014 yil 22 noyabrda. Olingan 8 fevral, 2018.
  3. ^ a b v d e Allen, Woody (February 7, 2014). "Woody Allen Speaks Out". The New York Times.
  4. ^ a b v d e f Wypijewski, Joann (February 26, 2014). "Woody and Mia: A Modern Family Timeline". Millat.
  5. ^ a b Henneberger, Melinda (September 25, 1993). "Connecticut Prosecutor Won't File Charges Against Woody Allen". The New York Times.
  6. ^ a b v d "Child Sexual Abuse Clinic Evaluation of Dylan Farrow" (PDF). Radaronline. 1993-03-17.
  7. ^ a b Wilk, Elliott, J. "Allen v. Farrow (1993)" (PDF).
  8. ^ a b Pérez-Peña, Richard (October 26, 1993). "Agency Drops Abuse Inquiry in Allen Case". The New York Times.
  9. ^ a b Weber, Bruce (August 14, 1992). "Woody Allen Files Child-Custody Lawsuit". The New York Times.
  10. ^ a b v d Wilk, Elliott, Custody Court Ruling, Supreme Court: New York County
  11. ^ Wilk, Elliott (July 6, 1993), Custody Case Ruling, Supreme Court: New York County
  12. ^ a b v d Marks, Peter (June 8, 1993). "Allen Loses to Farrow in Bitter Custody Battle". The New York Times.
  13. ^ a b v d e f g Shea, Danny (February 7, 2014). "Here's The 1993 Woody Allen Custody Ruling In Its Damning, Detailed Entirety". HuffPost.; Allen v. Farrow (1993) (N.Y. Sup. June 7, 1993).
  14. ^ a b v d e f Allen v. Farrow (1994) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department, May 12, 1994).
  15. ^ a b Allen v. Farrow (1995) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department, May 4, 1995).

    Brozan, Nadine (July 6, 1995). "Xronika". The New York Times.

  16. ^ Farrow, Mia (2018-05-15). What Falls Away : A Memoir. p. 299. ISBN  9781984800114. OCLC  1035846541.
  17. ^ January 18, CBS News; 2018 yil; Am, 7:20. "Dylan Farrow details her sexual molestation allegations against Woody Allen". www.cbsnews.com. Olingan 2019-03-22.CS1 maint: raqamli ismlar: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
  18. ^ a b v d e f g Ort, Mureen (2013 yil 23 oktyabr). "Momma Mia!". Vanity Fair.
  19. ^ a b Farrow, Dylan (February 1, 2014). "Dylan Farrow's Story". The New York Times.
  20. ^ a b Farrow, Dylan (December 7, 2017). "Dylan Farrow: Why has the #MeToo revolution spared Woody Allen?". Los-Anjeles Tayms.
  21. ^ "Woody responds to Dylan Farrow sexual abuse allegations". CBS News. 2018 yil 18-yanvar. Olingan 8 fevral 2018.
  22. ^ [http://mosesfarrow.blogspot.com/2018/05/a-son-speaks-out-by-moses-farrow.html A SON SPEAKS OUT By Moses Farrow]
  23. ^ Soon-Yi Previn Defends Woody Allen and Accuses Mia Farrow of Abuse
  24. ^ A SON SPEAKS OUT By Moses Farrow
  25. ^ a b Dinitia, Smith (May 8, 1994). "Picking Up The Legos And The Pieces". The New York Times.
  26. ^ a b Lax, Eric (February 24, 1991). "Woody and Mia: A New York Story". The New York Times.
  27. ^ "Woody Allen, Mia Farrow family tree". CNN. 2016 yil 11-may.
  28. ^ a b v d e f g h men j k l Stern, Marlow (February 10, 2014). "Inside the Shocking Custody Case Court Documents that Shed Light on the Dylan Farrow-Woody Allen Saga". The Daily Beast.
  29. ^ "Son Born to Mia Farrow And Woody Allen". The New York Times. Associated Press. December 22, 1987.
  30. ^ a b v Marks, Peter (March 27, 1993). "Farrow Says Daughter Became Distraught Over Allen's Relentless Attention". The New York Times.
  31. ^ a b Reilly, William M. (March 25, 1993). "Mia: I worried about Woody being a homosexual". United Press International. Olingan 14 oktyabr, 2018.
  32. ^ Farrow, Mia (1997). What Falls Away:a memoir. Nyu-York: ikki kunlik. p. 249. ISBN  0-385-47187-4.
  33. ^ Reilly, M. William (January 12, 1993). "More bombshells dropped at Woody Allen hearing". United Press International.
  34. ^ a b v d e Marks, Peter (March 30, 1993). "Doctor Recounts Threats By Farrow Against Allen". The New York Times.
  35. ^ L. Miller, Tracy (March 30, 1993). "Psychiatrist: Woody was committed to being a good father". United Press International. Olingan 30 mart, 1990. Sana qiymatlarini tekshiring: | kirish tarixi = (Yordam bering)
  36. ^ a b Perez-Pena, Richard (March 23, 1993). "Nude Photographs Are Focus Of Woody Allen's Testimony". The New York Times.
  37. ^ Hackett, Larry (1988-06-01). "New York Daily News Easter Season Poll, 1986": 5. doi:10.3886/icpsr08584. Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  38. ^ Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department. (1994 yil 12-may). "Woody Allen, Appellant, v. Maria V. Farrow, Also Known as Mia Farrow, Respondent". 197 A.D.2d 327 (1994). Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  39. ^ United States Congressional Serial Set, Issue 13173, 1977, p. 170.
  40. ^ United States Congressional Serial Set, 1978, p. cxlii–cxliv.
  41. ^ Groteke, Kristi; Rosen, Marjorie (1994). Mia & Woody. Love and betrayal. Carroll & Graf Publishers, Inc. p.79. ISBN  0-7867-0066-1.
  42. ^ a b v d e Perez-Pena, Richard (June 19, 1993). "Farrow Spurns Allen's Plea For a Truce". The New York Times.
  43. ^ a b Isaacson, Walter (June 24, 2001). "The Heart Wants What It Wants". Vaqt. First published August 31, 1992.
  44. ^ a b v Perez-Pena, Richard (March 20, 1993). "Woody Allen Tells of Affair as Custody Battle Begins". The New York Times.
  45. ^ Grimes, William (August 31, 1992). "A Chronology of a Film's Making And a Relationship's Unmaking". The New York Times.
  46. ^ a b Barron, James (August 21, 1992). "Plot of New Woody Allen Film Seems to Mimic His Life". The New York Times.
  47. ^ James, Caryn (September 6, 1992). "Film View; And Here We Thought We Knew Him". The New York Times.
  48. ^ Farrow, Mia (1997). What Falls Away. Nyu-York: Bantam. p. 269.
  49. ^ "Allen Said Farrow Made Good On Her Promise". [1] Spiker-sharh, November 23rd, 1992. (p.1) Retrieved 14 October 2018.
  50. ^ EDT, Newsweek Staff On 8/30/92 at 8:00 PM (1992-08-30). "Soon-Yi Speaks: 'Let's Not Get Hysterical'". Newsweek. Olingan 2019-09-04.
  51. ^ "Modern Reasons For Old Taboos on Incest". Jack Waterford, Kanberra Tayms. 27 August 1992 (p 9) Retrieved 14th October 2018.
  52. ^ Collins, Glenn (December 25, 1997). "Mixed Reviews Greet Woody Allen Marriage". The New York Times.
  53. ^ Hoban, Phoebe (September 21, 1992). Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Woody and Mia (But Were Afraid to Ask). Google kitoblari. Nyu-York jurnali.
  54. ^ Farrow (1997), p. 270.
  55. ^ a b v d Cite error: nomlangan ma'lumotnoma MosesFarrowMay2018 chaqirilgan, ammo hech qachon aniqlanmagan (qarang yordam sahifasi).
  56. ^ a b v Marks, Peter (April 10, 1993). "Sitter Questions Allen Actions With Daughter". The New York Times.
  57. ^ Groteke, Kristi (1994). Mia & Woody : love and betrayal. Kerol va Graf. p. 169. OCLC  1036704501.
  58. ^ Farrow 1997, p. 272; "Woody Allen claims videotape proves Mia's 'unfitness' as mother". UPI. December 21, 1992.
  59. ^ Farrow (1997), p. 272.
  60. ^ a b v Orth, Maureen (7 February 2014). "10 Undeniable Facts About the Woody Allen Sexual-Abuse Allegation". Vanity Fair.
  61. ^ a b "Woody: Abuse charge, video tape forced him to seek children's custody" Frederick M Winship. August 19th, 1992. UPI. Qabul qilingan 14 oktyabr 2018 yil.
  62. ^ Dershowitz, Alan M. (2013). Taking the stand : my life in the law (Birinchi nashr). Nyu York. p. 739. ISBN  978-0-307-71927-0. OCLC  849740874.
  63. ^ Span, Paula (1993-04-17). "The Brawling Barristers". Washington Post. ISSN  0190-8286. Olingan 2020-04-20.
  64. ^ Rabinovitz, Jonathan (August 16, 1992). "War! Mia Fights Back With (Gasp!) Publicity". The New York Times.
  65. ^ a b Weber, Bruce (August 18, 1992). "Public Disclosures From the Private Life of Woody Allen". The New York Times.
  66. ^ a b Wilkinson, Alissa (January 11, 2018). "Why Woody Allen hasn't been toppled by the #MeToo reckoning — yet". Vox.
  67. ^ Marks, Peter (August 16, 1992). "Dershowitz Says Farrow Involved Him". The New York Times.
  68. ^ Barron, James (August 19, 1992). "Striking Back, Woody Allen Denies Child Sex-Abuse Allegation". The New York Times.
  69. ^ "Dershowitz: Woody is on the road to ruin". UPI. Olingan 2019-11-15.
  70. ^ Barron, James (August 20, 1992). "Allen 'Spoiled and Mutilated' His Better Self, Farrow Says". The New York Times.
  71. ^ Goldman, John J. (May 5, 1993). "Final Arguments in Allen Custody Trial as Bitter as First". Los Anjeles Tayms.
  72. ^ a b Hevesi, Dennis (August 23, 1992). "Woody Allen Tells His Side to a Magazine". The New York Times.
  73. ^ Groteke, Kristi (1994). Mia & Woody : love and betrayal. Kerol va Graf. p. 172. OCLC  1036704501.
  74. ^ Hackett, Larry (1993-01-13). "Saw dad, Soon Yi in bed:Woody Kid". Nyu-York Daily News.
  75. ^ Kocieniewski, David (1993-01-13). "Dylan Saw It All 7-year-old says she watched Woody, Soon-Yi having sex". Yangiliklar kuni.
  76. ^ a b Polner, Rob (1993-03-19). "Woody Says He's Cleared Report: No sign of sex abuse: Excerpts From the Yale Report". Yangiliklar kuni.
  77. ^ Associated Press (1993-01-13). "Lawyer:kids saw Woody, Soon Yi have sex". Yulduzli gazeta. p. 2018-04-02 121 2.
  78. ^ Hackett, Larry (1993-01-20). "Woody & Mia OK shrink for Dylan". Daily News.
  79. ^ a b v d Thibault, Andy (November 1997). "People: Frank Maco". Konnektikut jurnali.
  80. ^ a b v d e f Eving, Charlz Patrik; McCann, Joseph T. (2006). "Woody Allen and Mia Farrow: A Swing of King Solomon's Sword". Minds on Trial: Great Cases in Law and Psychology. Nyu-York: Oksford universiteti matbuoti. (pp. 153–164), p. 159.
  81. ^ a b v d Winter, Jessica (February 7, 2014). "Woody Allen and Dylan Farrow: Just the Facts". Slate.
  82. ^ "[PDF] CURRICULUM VITAE. John M. Leventhal, M.D. - Free Download PDF". slidex.tips. Olingan 2019-03-20.
  83. ^ "Julia Pearl Hamilton, Obituary".
  84. ^ a b Groteke, Kristi (1994). Mia & Woody : love and betrayal. Kerol va Graf. p. 168. OCLC  1036704501.
  85. ^ Groteke, Kristi (1994). Mia & Woody : love and betrayal. Kerol va Graf. p. 222. OCLC  1036704501.
  86. ^ Marks, Peter (May 5, 1993). "Allen-Farrow Trial Ends in New Round of Old Charges". The New York Times.
  87. ^ Penez-Pena, Richard (December 12, 1992). "Judge Bars Broadcasters From Farrow-Allen Case". The New York Times.
  88. ^ Groteke, Kristie; Rosen, Marjorie (1994). Mia & Woody: Love and Betrayal. Nyu-York: Carroll & Graf Publishers.
  89. ^ a b Goldman, John J. (February 2, 1993). "Nanny Casts Doubt on Farrow Charges". Los Anjeles Tayms. Arxivlandi from the original on January 19, 2018.
  90. ^ Span, Paula (April 7, 1993). "Clash of the Nannies". Washington Post.
  91. ^ Groteke, Kristi (1994). Mia & Woody : love and betrayal. Kerol va Graf. p. 126. OCLC  1036704501.
  92. ^ "Mia's nanny says Woody was the better parent". UPI. Olingan 2019-03-19.
  93. ^ "Expert witness doubts Woody abused adopted daughter". UPI. Olingan 2019-03-23.
  94. ^ Grimes, William (March 31, 1993). "Farrow's Lawyer Takes Aim at Doctor's Judgment". The New York Times.
  95. ^ Marks, Peter (1993-04-02). "Psychologist Testifies About Visitation Rights for Allen". The New York Times. ISSN  0362-4331. Olingan 2019-03-31.
  96. ^ Hackett, Larry (1993-04-09). "Woody´s lawyer says Conn. cops siding with Mia". Daily News.
  97. ^ Span, Paula (April 16, 1993). "Dershowitz: Woody Would Not Budge". Washington Post.
  98. ^ Alan Dershowitz - Charlie Rose, olingan 2019-03-19
  99. ^ Perez-Pena, Richard (May 4, 1993). "Doctor Cites Inconsistencies In Dylan Farrow's Statements". The New York Times.
  100. ^ a b Marks, Peter (April 28, 1993). "Yale Study About Allen Flawed, Expert Testifies". The New York Times.
  101. ^ Miller, Tracey L. (April 26, 1993). "Judge in Woody-Mia child custody case airs anti-Allen views". UPI.
  102. ^ Span, Paula (1993-04-28). "EVIDENCE WITH A DOUBLE EDGE". Washington Post.
  103. ^ The Associated Press (1993-04-28). "Woody vs. Mia case drawing to a close". Asbury Park Press (Asbury Park, New Jersey).
  104. ^ Span, Paula (1993-04-28). "EVIDENCE WITH A DOUBLE EDGE". Washington Post.
  105. ^ a b Ewing & McCann (2006), p. 160.
  106. ^ Groteke, Kristi (1994). Mia & Woody : love and betrayal. Kerol va Graf. p. 169. OCLC  1036704501.
  107. ^ a b Ewing & McCann (2006), p. 161.
  108. ^ Ewing & McCann (2006), 160-161 betlar.
  109. ^ "Dylan Farrow details her sexual molestation allegations against Woody Allen". CBS News. 2018 yil 18-yanvar.
  110. ^ "Statement of Decision 9-24-1993". Skribd. Olingan 2019-05-04.
  111. ^ "Therapist says Woody Allen No Sex Offender". Jeanne King, Daily News, (p.12) April 21st, 1993. Retrieved 14 October 2018.
  112. ^ Perez-Pena, Richard (October 14, 1993). "Woody Allen Asks Connecticut to Discipline Prosecutor". The New York Times.
  113. ^ Kennedy, Randy (November 4, 1993). "Woody Allen Fails to Beat A Prosecutor". The New York Times.
  114. ^ Perez-Pena, Richard (February 24, 1994). "Panel Criticizes Prosecutor In Inquiry on Woody Allen". The New York Times.
  115. ^ Perez Pena, Richard (January 14, 1994). "Woody Allen Appeals Judgment in Custody Case". The New York Times.
  116. ^ "Soon-Yi Speaks: 'Let's Not Get Hysterical'". Newsweek. 1992 yil 30-avgust. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2018 yil 13 aprelda. Olingan 9 iyun, 2018.
  117. ^ Farrow, Mia (1997). What Falls Away. Nyu-York: Bantam. p. 271.
  118. ^ "Ms. Farrow claimed that Mr. Allen had long been focusing inappropriate sexual attention on their 7-year-old adoptive daughter Dylan."[2] "Intimate Strangers". Ketrin Xarrison, The New York Times 23rd February, 1997. Retrieved 14th October, 2018.
  119. ^ "In Farrow's life, apparently, no gruesome situation goes untopped: She further claims that Allen was guilty of sexually abusing her 7-year-old adopted daughter." "Rosemary's Mother". Celia McGee, LA Times, March 2nd, 1997. Retrieved October 14th, 2018.
  120. ^ Pulver, Andrew (January 13, 2014). "Woody Allen Golden Globe greeted with derision by Mia and Ronan Farrow". The Guardian.
  121. ^ "Woody Allen Calls Sexual Abuse Claims 'Untrue and Disgraceful'". Turli xillik. 2014 yil 2-fevral.
  122. ^ Thibault, Andy (February 14, 2014). "Cool Justice: New York Times bent rules for Woody Allen, but not for Frank Maco". Nyu-Yorkdagi ro'yxatdan o'tish.
  123. ^ a b Farrow, Ronan (May 11, 2016). "My Father, Woody Allen, and the Danger of Questions Unasked (Guest Column)". Hollywood Reporter.
  124. ^ Ullman, Joan (January 3, 2018). "Ronan Farrow: Man on a Mission". Bugungi kunda psixologiya.
  125. ^ Rothman, Michael (February 5, 2014). "Dylan Farrow's Brother Moses Says Mia Farrow, Not Woody Allen Was Abusive". ABC News.

    Pulver, Andrew (5 February 2013). "Moses Farrow defends Woody Allen over child abuse allegations". The Guardian.

  126. ^ Laks, Erik (2017). Start To Finish: Woody Allen and the Art of MovieMaking. Nyu-York: Alfred A. Knopf. 123–129 betlar.
  127. ^ "Dylan Farrow details her sexual assault allegations against Woody Allen". CBS News. Olingan 13 iyun, 2020.
  128. ^ "Woody Allen responds to Dylan Farrow sexual abuse allegations". CBS News. Olingan 13 iyun, 2020.
  129. ^ "A Son Speaks Out". mosesfarrow.blogspot. Olingan 13 iyun, 2020.
  130. ^ Stephens, Clare (May 28, 2018). "'There was a darkness within our family.' The complex and tragic story of Mia Farrow's 14 children". Avstraliya: Mamamiya. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2018 yil 28 mayda. Olingan 9 iyun, 2018.
  131. ^ Real, Evan (May 23, 2018). "Woody Allen's Son Moses Farrow Defends Father, Claims Mother Mia Farrow Was Abusive". Hollywood Reporter. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2018 yil 1 iyunda. Olingan 9 iyun, 2018.
  132. ^ https://www.vulture.com/2018/09/soon-yi-previn-speaks.html
  133. ^ https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/17/arts/soon-yi-previn-woody-allen-mia-farrow.html
  134. ^ Paulson, Michael (June 25, 2018). "Goodspeed Cancels Woody Allen Musical". The New York Times.
  135. ^ Martinez, Shandra (February 1, 2018). "Grand Rapids theater cancels Woody Allen's musical in support of #MeToo". MLive.com. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2018 yil 9 iyunda. Olingan 1 fevral, 2018.
  136. ^ Flaherty, Collen.(February 26th, 2018."Woody Allen and Academic Freedom". Olingan 3 aprel 2018 yil.
  137. ^ "Rosie O'Donnell says she believes Dylan Farrow's allegations". UPI. 2014 yil 2-fevral.
  138. ^ Nianias, Helen (January 26, 2015). "Lena Dunham rips into Woody Allen and calls him a 'perv' at Sundance". Mustaqil.
  139. ^ Miller, Julie (July 7, 2016). "Is It Wrong to Work with Woody Allen?". Vanity Fair.
  140. ^ Lang, Brent (May 15, 2016). "Susan Sarandon on Woody Allen: 'He Sexually Assaulted a Child'". Turli xillik.
  141. ^ Erickson, Amanda (January 22, 2018). "'An abuser and pervert': Women in Spain want a statue of Woody Allen removed". Washington Post.
    Govan, Fiona (January 22, 2018). "Women demand Woody Allen statue removed in Oviedo after sex molestation allegations". The Local Spain.

    "A man looks at a banner on sculpture of Woody Allen during the rally on the World Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women in Oviedo". Reuters. November 25, 2017.

  142. ^ McHenry, Jackson (October 16, 2017). "The Tick Actor Griffin Newman Regrets Working With Woody Allen, Promises to Donate His Salary From the Film". Vulture.com.
  143. ^ Desata, Yohan (November 10, 2017). "Ellen Page Accuses Brett Ratner of 'Homophobic and Abusive Behavior'". Vanity Fair. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2017 yil 16-noyabrda. Olingan 9 iyun, 2018.
  144. ^ Page, Ellen (2017 yil 10-noyabr). "'You should fuck her to make her realize she's gay'". Ellen Page verified Facebook. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2018 yil 29 yanvarda. Olingan 9 iyun, 2018.
  145. ^ Rachel Wood, Evan [@evanrachelwood] (2016 yil 4-dekabr). "That was years before I read Dylan's letter" (Tweet). Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2018 yil 9 iyunda. Olingan 18 yanvar, 2018 - orqali Twitter.
  146. ^ Briese, Nicole (December 5, 2016). "Evan Rachel Wood Just Took a Stand Against This Hollywood Heavyweight". Brit + Co. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2018 yil 9 iyunda. Olingan 9 iyun, 2018.
  147. ^ Verhoeven, Beatrice (January 6, 2018). "'Wonder Wheel' Actor Calls Working With Woody Allen 'One of My Most Heartbreaking Mistakes'". Saralash.
  148. ^ Sorvino, Mira (January 11, 2018). "Exclusive: Mira Sorvino's Open Letter To Dylan Farrow". HuffPost.
  149. ^ Levin, Sam (12 January 2018). "Rebecca Hall says she won't work with Woody Allen again". The Guardian.
  150. ^ a b Harmon, Steph (16 January 2018). "Timothée Chalamet: 'I don't want to profit from my work on Woody Allen's film'". The Guardian.
  151. ^ Feinberg, Scott (January 17, 2018). "Rachel Brosnahan Says She Regrets Working With Woody Allen". Hollywood Reporter.
  152. ^ Cooney, Samantha (January 18, 2018). "These Actors All Worked With Woody Allen. Now They Regret It and Support Dylan Farrow". Vaqt.
  153. ^ Levin, Sam (January 18, 2018). "Colin Firth says he will not work with Woody Allen again". The Guardian.

    Leszkiewicz, Anna (January 20, 2018). "Sadly, Colin Firth's words on Woody Allen have a power that women's don't". Yangi shtat arbobi.

  154. ^ Hogan, Michael (January 28, 2018). "Hayley Atwell: 'It's very liberating to play someone who's unapologetically ruthless'". The Guardian.
  155. ^ Hattenstone, Simon (January 27, 2019). "Freida Pinto: 'I wouldn't work with Woody Allen again'". The Guardian. Olingan 27 yanvar, 2019.
  156. ^ "John Turturro interview: 'I wouldn't cast Woody Allen now'". Mustaqil. 2019 yil 7-iyun. Olingan 8 iyun, 2019.
  157. ^ a b Rozen, Kristofer; Romano, Nik (2018 yil 10-yanvar). "Greta Gerwig regrets working with Woody Allen". Ko'ngilochar haftalik. Olingan 2 mart, 2018.
  158. ^ "Greta Gerwig side steps Woody Allen question at Golden Globes". 96 news HD. 2018 yil 8-yanvar. Olingan 8 yanvar, 2018.
  159. ^ Bruni, Frank; Gerwig, Greta; Sorkin, Aaron (January 9, 2018). "Greta Gervig, Aaron Sorkin: Gollivud o'zgarishi kerak". The New York Times. ISSN  0362-4331. Olingan 2 mart, 2018.
  160. ^ "Elle Fanning Vudi Allen bilan ishlashdan afsuslanadi, agar bundan xafa bo'lgan bo'lsangiz". Metro. 2018-03-11. Olingan 2019-07-24.
  161. ^ "Xoakin Feniks Vudi Allen bilan ishlagan paytida Dilan Farrowning ochiq xatidan" xabardor emas ". AQSh BUGUN. Olingan 2019-07-24.
  162. ^ Sharf, Zak (2018 yil 27-fevral). "Jeff Daniels Dylan Farrow-ga ishonadi, ammo Vudi Allenni rad etish" qiyin qaror "bo'lishini aytadi'". Indiewire.com. Olingan 1 mart, 2018.
  163. ^ Miller, Mayk (2018 yil 9 mart). "Jef Denielsning aytishicha, Vudi Allen merosi endi" katta yulduzcha "ga ega'". Odamlar. Olingan 10 mart, 2018.
  164. ^ "Piter Sarsgaard yana Vudi Allen bilan ishlamasligini aytdi, ammo Jeff Deniels qarorsiz qoldi". PEOPLE.com. Olingan 2019-07-24.
  165. ^ Setoodeh, Ramin; Setoodeh, Ramin (2018-01-20). "Xloi Sevigni Vudi Allen bilan yana" ishlamasligini "aytdi (eksklyuziv)". Turli xillik. Olingan 2019-07-24.
  166. ^ xodimlar, Guardian (2018-01-19). "Vudi Allenda Marion Kotillard:" Biz bilan bo'lgan tajriba juda g'alati edi'". The Guardian. ISSN  0261-3077. Olingan 2019-07-24.
  167. ^ Rayman, Nuh (2014 yil 4-fevral). "Barbara Valters Vudi Allenni himoya qilmoqda". Turli xillik.
    Brockes, Emma (2014 yil 3-may). "Dayan Kiton:" Men Vudini yaxshi ko'raman. Va men do'stimga ishonaman'". The Guardian.
  168. ^ Nast, Kond. "Xaver Bardem Vudi Allenning tarafida:" Menga bu to'satdan davolanish juda zarba berdi"". Vanity Fair. Olingan 2019-07-24.
  169. ^ Pulver, Endryu (2018-11-20). "'Dahshatli sharmandalik: Jyud Lud Vudi Allen filmini himoya qiladi, Amazon uni to'xtatgandan keyin ". The Guardian. ISSN  0261-3077. Olingan 2019-07-24.
  170. ^ Chuba, Kirsten (16.01.2018). "Alek Bolduin Yulduzlarni Vudi Allenni qoralashini tanqid qilmoqda:" Bu adolatsiz va g'amgin'". Turli xillik.
  171. ^ Fernandez, Mett (2018-01-29). "Dayan Kiton Vudi Allenni himoya qiladi:" Men unga ishonishda davom etaman'". Turli xillik. Olingan 2018-05-03.
  172. ^ Vayd, Robert B. (2011-11-20), Vudi Allen: Hujjatli film, Vudi Allen, Letti Aronson, Marshall Brickman, olingan 2018-03-08
  173. ^ Vayd, Robert B. (2014-01-27). "Vudi Allenning da'volari: unchalik tez emas". The Daily Beast. Olingan 2018-03-08.
  174. ^ rbweide (2019-04-08). "Vudi Allen haqidagi haqiqat (I qism)". Ushbu Mortal lasan. Olingan 2020-04-12.
  175. ^ rbweide (2019-04-08). "Vudi Allen haqidagi haqiqat (II qism)". Ushbu Mortal lasan. Olingan 2020-04-12.
  176. ^ Ryzik, Melena; Barns, Bruks (2018 yil 28-yanvar). "Vudi Allen yana Gollivudda ishlay oladimi?". The New York Times.
  177. ^ "Skarlett Yoxanssonning mavsumi: ikkita issiq film, uning ajablanarli kelajagi, Vudi Allen va prezident uchun tanlov". Hollywood Reporter. Olingan 13 iyun, 2020.
  178. ^ Macnab, Jefri. (2018 yil 19-fevral) "Emili Mortimer bilan suhbat". Mustaqil. Olingan 16 mart 2018 yil.
  179. ^ Telegraph muxbirlari, (22 mart 2018 yil)."Keyt Blanshett Vudi Allen bilan ishlash paytida #MeToo-da" jim turishni "rad etadi". Daily Telegraph. Olingan 3 aprel 2018 yil.
  180. ^ "Vudi Allenning jinsiy axloqsizligi to'g'risida gaplashgan 6 ta aktrisa". Elle. Olingan 13 iyun, 2020.
  181. ^ Desta, Yohanna (2018 yil 19-oktabr). "Xaver Bardem Vudi Allen Backlash-ni chaqirmoqda" Ochiq Lynching"". Vanity Fair. Olingan 9-noyabr, 2018.
  182. ^ Xodimlar, Guardian (19.04.2018). "Xaver Bardem Vudi Allenni himoya qilmoqda:" Men bunday muomaladan juda hayratda qoldim'". The Guardian. Olingan 9-noyabr, 2018.
  183. ^ Svetkey, Benjamin (2019 yil 25-yanvar). "Alan Alda" M * A * S * H ​​"merosi va nega u yana Vudi Allen bilan ishlagan". Hollywood Reporter. Olingan 4-fevral, 2019.
  184. ^ Baraklo, Leo (11.03.2018). "Maykl Keyn: Men Vudi Allen bilan yana ishlamayman". Turli xillik. Olingan 11 mart, 2018.
  185. ^ Braun, Devid (2019 yil 22-yanvar). "So'nggi so'z: Maykl Keyn birinchi marta baland ko'tarilganida va u eng afsuslanadigan rolida". Rolling Stone. Olingan 2 mart, 2019.
  186. ^ Chiu, Ellison (2019 yil 8-noyabr). "Jeff Goldblum yana Vudi Allen bilan ishlashni o'ylab ko'rishini aytdi va Internet yaxshi emas". Washington Post. Olingan 8-noyabr, 2019.
  187. ^ Dovd, Mourin (2020 yil 4-aprel). "Larri Devid, uning karantini ustasi". The New York Times. Olingan 4-aprel, 2020.
  188. ^ "Spayk Li Vudi Allenni" bu bekor qilinadigan narsadan "himoya qiladi:" Vudi mening do'stim'". Ko'ngilochar haftalik. Olingan 13 iyun, 2020.
  189. ^ "'Vudi mening do'stim ': Spayk Li madaniyatni bekor qilish tarafdori emas, Allenni qo'llab-quvvatlaydi ". USA Today. Olingan 13 iyun, 2020.
  190. ^ Allen, Vudi. (23 mart 2020 yil). Hech narsaning aproposlari. ISBN  978-1-951627-34-8. OCLC  1147948052.

Tashqi havolalar